Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine student learning activities and outcomes in the subject matter of mechanics and statistics. The research method used is Classroom Action Research (CAR) with a cooperative learning model. The results of the study found that in the first cycle, the learning outcomes of students who took part in the Statics and Material Mechanics lecture material using conventional learning, namely that of 34 students only got an average score of 64.27%. In addition, the increase in learning activities also did not meet student completeness because the number of students who received a minimum score in the good category was still below 75%, namely 42.5%, with the class average value only showing the good category. Furthermore, in cycle II there was an increase in student learning activity of 16.78% with an average class score of 3.41 which indicated a very good category. As for student learning outcomes, the average score was 74.375 in cycle I to 92.00 in cycle II with an increased proportion of learning outcomes of 23.70%. Increasing learning activities in cycle II was successful because the average class value was 3.41 (very good) with a student proportion of 80%. the number of students who follow the learning process. And to improve learning outcomes in cycle II in this study it has fulfilled its success because many students have a minimum KKM score of 90% with an average score of 92.00.

Keywords

Keaktifan; Hasil Belajar ; Pembelajaran Kooperatif

Article Details

References

  1. desta tri Maharani, O. and Kristin, F. (2017) ‘Peningkatan keaktifan dan hasil belajar IPS melalui model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe make a match’, Wacana Akademika: Majalah Ilmiah Kependidikan, 1(1).
  2. Hasanah, Z. and Himami, A. S. (2021) ‘Model pembelajaran kooperatif dalam menumbuhkan keaktifan belajar siswa’, Irsyaduna: Jurnal Studi Kemahasiswaaan, 1(1), pp. 1–13.
  3. Hazmiwati, H. (2018) ‘Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Ipa Siswa Kelas Ii Sekolah Dasar’, Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 7(1), pp. 178–184.
  4. Indonesia, U.-U. R. (2003) ‘Sistem pendidikan nasional’, Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Menengah Umum.
  5. Kurikulum, P. and NASIONAL, D. P. (2007) ‘Naskah Akademik Kajian Kebijakan Kurikulum SMK’, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, diakses, 10(10), p. 2009.
  6. Kusumawardani, N., Siswanto, J. and Purnamasari, V. (2018) ‘Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD berbantuan media poster terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik’, Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 2(2), pp. 170–174.
  7. Muharom, T. (2014) ‘Pengaruh pembelajaran dengan model kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) terhadap kemampuan penalaran dan komunikasi matematik peserta didik di SMK Negeri Manonjaya Kabupaten Tasikmalaya’, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Keguruan, 1(1), p. 209691.
  8. Sedayu, M. A. (2016) ‘Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Mekanika Teknik Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran STAD pada Siswa Paket Keahlian Gambar Bangunan SMK Negeri 1 Magelang’, Tugas Akhir Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Yogyakarta: FT UNY.
  9. Sizi, Y., Bare, Y. and Galis, R. (2021) ‘Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Talking Stick Terhadap Keaktifan dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Peserta Didik SMP Kelas VIII’, Spizaetus: Jurnal Biologi dan Pendidikan Biologi, 2(1), pp. 39–46.
  10. Wijaya, H. and Arismunandar, A. (2018) ‘Pengembangan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe stad berbasis media sosial’, Jurnal Jaffray, 16(2), pp. 175–196.