Main Article Content


This study aims at exploring the emotional engagement of students in the context of technology-assisted self-regulated learning for EFL writing. This study employed a qualitative method with case study blended ethnographic approach. Nine EFL students and 2 EFL lecturers were conveniently recruited, and the data were analyzed using thematic analysis technique. Based on the results, it is evident that students exhibit high levels of interest, enthusiasm, and curiosity in technology-supported learning environments. Their active participation, problem-solving abilities, and eagerness to utilize technological tools reflect their engagement in self-regulated learning processes. Further research on exploring the challenges and barriers associated with technology integration in EFL classrooms would provide practical guidance for educators seeking to maximize the benefits of technology in language learning.


Emotional Engagement; Self-regulation; Technology assisted learning

Article Details


  1. Alemi, M. (2016). General Impacts of Integrating Advanced and Modern Technologies on Teaching English as a Foreign Language. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 5(1), 13–26.
  2. An, Z., Wang, C., Li, S., Gan, Z., & Li, H. (2021). Technology-Assisted Self-Regulated English Language Learning: Associations With English Language Self-Efficacy, English Enjoyment, and Learning Outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 558466.
  3. Bahari, A., & Gholami, L. (2022). Challenges and affordances of reading and writing development in technology-assisted language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–24.
  4. Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349–362.
  5. Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–287.
  6. Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 97–131.
  7. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. In Source: Review of Educational Research (Vol. 74, Issue 1). http://www.jstor.orgURL:
  8. Fredricks, J. A., Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2019). Interventions for Student Engagement: Overview and State of the Field. Handbook of Student Engagement Interventions: Working with Disengaged Students, 1–11.
  9. Huang, C. (2022). Self-Regulation of Learning and EFL Learners’ Hope and Joy: A Review of Literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 833279.
  10. Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2014). Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms. The California School Psychologist 2003 8:1, 8(1), 7–27.
  11. Lackmann, S., Léger, P. M., Charland, P., Aubé, C., & Talbot, J. (2021). The Influence of Video Format on Engagement and Performance in Online Learning. Brain Sciences 2021, Vol. 11, Page 128, 11(2), 128.
  12. Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335.
  13. Liu, S. (2022). Toward the Role of L2 Enjoyment in EFL Students’ Academic Motivation and Engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 822588.
  14. Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 3–19.
  15. Salih, A., & Holi, H. I. (2018). English Language and the Changing Linguistic Landscape: New Trends in ELT Classrooms. Arab World English Journal, 9(1), 97–107.
  16. Shyr, W.-J., & Chen, C.-H. (2018). Designing a technology-enhanced flipped learning system to facilitate students’ self-regulation and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(1), 53–62.
  17. Smokotin, V. M., Alekseyenko, A. S., & Petrova, G. I. (2014). The Phenomenon of Linguistic Globalization: English as the Global Lingua Franca (EGLF). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 154, 509–513.
  18. Ulmanen, S., Soini, T., Pyhältö, K., & Pietarinen, J. (2014). Strategies for academic engagement perceived by Finnish sixth and eighth graders. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(3), 425–443.
  19. van Alten, D. C. D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2020). Self-regulated learning support in flipped learning videos enhances learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 158, 104000.
  20. Wang, J., Zhang, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Effects of Teacher Engagement on Students’ Achievement in an Online English as a Foreign Language Classroom: The Mediating Role of Autonomous Motivation and Positive Emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 950652.
  21. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2010). Self-regulated learning and socio-cognitive theory.
  22. Yaccob, N. S., Yunus, M. M., & John, D. S. (2023). Global education movement: English as a second language teachers’ perceptions of integrating volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity elements in lessons. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1007970.
  23. Zhang, X. (2021). The Impact of EFL Students’ Emotioncy Level on Their Motivation and Academic Achievement: A Theoretical Conceptual Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 798564.
  24. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183.