Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 589 Download : 1558

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to describe the characteristics of young perpetrators and victims of bullying asking for money by force (insulting). This research uses a qualitative approach with a qualitative descriptive design. Subjects were 4 (four) adolescents, namely one perpetrator and three victims of bullying forcibly asking for money (insulting) with an age range of 13-17 years. Data collection techniques used were observation, interviews, and documentation. The data analysis techniques used were data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions and verification. The results showed that the characteristics of young perpetrators and victims of bullying asking for money by force (insulting) are factors that influence young people who do bullying are family, economy, personality, popularity. The factors that influence the behavior of the victims of bullying are personality, namely they do not have the power to resist, are helpless because they are threatened, and do not want something worse to happen. The self-concept of adolescents bullying is showing negativity, that is, they perceive themselves as having power. Meanwhile, the self-concept of youth victims of bullying is negative, that is, they perceive themselves as weak, powerless to refuse the perpetrator's request. The ability to manage emotions among bullies is in the category of not being able to manage emotions, while youth victims of bullying are in the category of being able to manage emotions well. The self-disclosure of teenagers bullying tends to be closed, and youth victims of bullying tend to be closed off.

Keywords

characteristics; adolescents bullying

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

Nurul Auliah, Uniska MAB Banjarmasin

Bimbingan dan Konseling

Nurmiati, Uniska MAB Banjarmasin

Bimbingan dan Konseling

References

  1. Adtya, V. R., & Rusmawati, D., 2018. Hubungan Antara Konsep diri Dengan Intensi Bullying pada siswa SMAN 1 Purbalingga. Jurnal Empati. Vol 7 (03) 252-258
  2. Agustina, B. R., & Permana, I., 2019. Bullying di Sekolah: Kurangnya Empati Pelaku Bullying dan Pencegahan. Jurnal Keperawatan Jiwa Vol. 3. 237-246.
  3. Ali, A., 2014. Kasus Bullying Terjadi di SMAN 9 Tangerang. Diambil 16 Maret 2018. dari https:// www.liputan6.com/news/read/2091798/kasus-bullying-terjadi-di-sman-9-tangerang
  4. Bandura, A., 1977. Social Learning Theory. New Jersey; Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  5. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. 2007. Qualitative research for education, an introduction to theory and methods. (5th ed) Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
  6. Corey, G., 2017. Theory and Praactice of Counselint and Psychotherapy (10th Edition). Boston, MA : Cengage Learning.
  7. Depkes, P. 2010. Kesehatan Remaja. Problem dan Solusinya. Jakarta: Salemba Medika.
  8. Dwipayanti & Indrawati. 2014. Hubungan antara tindakan Bullying dengan Prestasi Belajar Anak Korban Bullying pada Tingkat Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Psikologi Udayana. Vol. 1, No.2, 1-9.
  9. Golmaryami, F. N., et al. 2016. The Social, Behavioral, and Emotional Correlates of Bullying and Victimization in A School-based Sample. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44 (2) 381-391.
  10. Hurlock, E.B. 2012. Psikologi Perkembangan. Jakarta Erlangga.
  11. Kusumasari, Hima., & Farida., 2019. Fenomena Bullying di Sekolah. Pedagogia. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. Vol 17 No. 1. 55-66.
  12. Malik. A. 2014. Forom Indonesia: Stop Bullying. Indonsia. Metro FV.
  13. Masruroh, N., Mufidah, C., & Rizky, I. A., 2016. Pengalaman Bullying Berdasarkan Perspektif Pelaku, Korban dan Saksi Mata Pelajar SMP “X” Kota Batu. ejournal, umm.ac.id/index.php/keperawatan/issuc/view. Vol 7 (02) 109-117.
  14. Moleong. L.J., 2017. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Edisi Revisi. Bandung. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  15. Olweus, D. 2009. Sweden. The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. London & New York: Routledge.
  16. Rigby, M. I., 2011. What Can Schools Do About Cases of Bullying? Pastoral Care in Education, 29 (4) 273-285
  17. Rizki, M. I., 2011. Pengaruh Kematangan Emosi terhadap Kecenderungan Perilaku Self Injury Pada Remaja. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta: Fakultas Psikologi.
  18. Santrock, J. W., 1998. Adelescence, ed:7. USA: MeGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
  19. Sarwono, S. W. 2010. Psikologi Remaja. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
  20. Skrzypiec. G.K., Slee. P. T., Askell-Wiliams.H., & Lawson, M. J. 2012. Associations between types of involvement in bullying, friendships and mental health status Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties. 17 (3-4) 259-272.
  21. Soedjatmiko, dkk., 2013. Gambaran Bullying dan Hubungan dengan Masalah Emosi dan Perilaku pada Anak Sekolah Dasar.fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia: Sari Pediatri.
  22. Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: alfabeta
  23. Wardah, A., 2020. Keterbukaan Diri dan Regulasi Emosi Peserta didik SMP Korban Bullying. Indonesia Journal of Learning Education and Counseling. Vol, No.2. 183-192.
  24. Wiyani, N.A.,2012. Save Our Children from School bullying. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media’
  25. Zain. E. Z., Humaedi. S., & Budiarti. M. S., 2019. Fenomena Bullying Siswa: Studi tentang Motif Perilaku Bullying Siswa di SMP Negeri 1 Painan, Sumatera Barat. Ijtimaiyya. Jurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat Islam.
  26. Zakiyah. e. Z., Humaedi, S., & Santoso, M.B.,2017. Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Remaja Dalam Melakukan Bullying. Jurnal Penelitian & PPM Unpad, 4. 324-330.